| |
WSPE eNews
A monthly publication from the Wisconsin Society of Professional
Engineers
January 3, 2008 Edition
1. |
WSPE's President's Corner |
I hope everyone had a wonderful holiday filled with
family, friends, and happiness. The beginning of 2008 marks the
midway point of the current fiscal year and election term for WSPE,
so I would like to take a few moments to recap what has happened
so far and outline what is coming up.
Legislative issues have dominated the year so far. Tracy Pinkowski,
P.E., and Bob Givens, P.E., with the help of other WSPE members
on the Legislative Committee, have been active monitoring and responding
to legislation regarding changes to the paths to engineering licensure,
mandatory continuing professional competency, and mandatory quality-based
selection (QBS) for certain public projects. WSPE also voiced concerns
at a recent hearing about a petition by the Wisconsin State Bar
Association to the Wisconsin Supreme Court to define the “practice
of law” due to its potential to significantly affect how engineers
practice their profession. The Metro Chapter is currently planning
a forum discussion at an upcoming luncheon meeting on January 22 or 23,
2008 to focus on these and other legislative issues. Look for more
information coming soon in their Chapter newsletter and on the website.
On the financial front, WSPE has kicked off our new Supporting
Organizations program. Contributions from this program are used
to help fund activities and programs at the state and chapter levels.
We currently have seven organizations on board. Our Platinum sponsors
are Graef, Anhalt, Schloemer & Associates, Inc. and R.A. Smith
& Associates, Inc. Our Silver sponsors are Davy Engineering
and Morgan & Parmley, Ltd. Our Bronze sponsors are HGA Architects
& Engineers, KL Engineering, Inc., and Ruekert & Mielke,
Inc. Please take a moment to visit the Supporting Organizations
page on the website at http://www.wspe.org/suptorgs.html.
Thank you for your support of WSPE – it makes a world of difference!
Matt Richards, P.E., has been working on membership issues this
year. He has gotten information to all the Chapters to begin a calling
program to try to get our delinquent and recently dropped members
to renew or rejoin WSPE. A strong membership is critical if WSPE
is to have a powerful voice in protecting the interests of professional
engineers and the integrity of the profession. Please continue to
encourage your colleagues to join if they are not yet members, including
students and new engineers. Remember, the first six months are FREE
and it’s easy to join by visiting www.nspe.org.
On the education side, the MATHCOUNTS program is once again underway.
So far, we have 84 schools around the state signed up to participate
in their regional competitions, which are held in February. The
State MATHCOUNTS competition will be held at UW-Madison on Saturday,
March 1, 2008. Volunteers are needed for this very worthwhile event,
so please contact Nancy Short at n.short@wspe.org
or 414-908-4950 x135 if you can help.
Angie Hanz, P.E., our new Young Engineer Representative, has begun
working to establish a student chapter of WSPE at UW-Marathon County,
where they are now offering a four-year engineering degree through
UW-Platteville. She hopes to expand her efforts to other UW system
schools as well. Please contact her at angela.hanz@wi.usda.gov
if you would like to help.
The WSPE website continues to be updated at www.wspe.org.
The website contains a wealth of information about WSPE, including
Chapters, scholarships, MATHCOUNTS, Supporting Organizations, membership,
constitution and bylaws, ethics, a Job Board, and handy links to
other resources. If you have ideas for the website or if you notice
anything you think needs fixing, please contact Nancy Short at n.short@wspe.org.
As we move into the second half of our year, we plan to complete
an Administrative Manual for WSPE, expand educational outreach activities,
continue to grow the Supporting Organizations program, and implement
member recruitment and retention initiatives. We will also be accepting
nominations for Engineer of the Year and Young Engineer of the Year
as well as Interest Group (formerly known as Practice Divisions)
awards. Also, remember to mark your calendars and plan to attend
the Discovery Conference and Governors New Product Awards banquet
on April 17, 2008, at the Kalahari Resort in Wisconsin Dells. See
the website for more details.
I’m looking forward to a great year with your help. Thanks!
James Buggs, P.E.
TOP |
SPONSOR

College of Engineering
Master of Engineering Professional Practice
A world-class graduate degree
to advance your career as a technical leader, featuring:
- Tools and strategies for succeeding in the global engineering
marketplace
- Unique blend of technical and managerial knowledge and skills
to help you advance as a leader
- Internet-based, collaborative learning with no interruption
to career or travel
Only 30 students admitted each
year - reserve your spot today!
|
2. |
Governor’s New Product Award 2008:
Call for Entries |
| Applications Due: Feb. 11, 2008
Evening Awards Ceremony and Banquet: Apr. 17. 2008, Kalahari Resort,
Wisconsin Dells
Questions? Contact: Dale Swenson, 414-343-8452, dale.swenson@harley-davidson.com
Each year, the Governor’s New Product Award is given to participants
in a variety of categories for engineering quality products that
do a number of things, including save time, energy, effectively
utilize engineering principles, or increase environmental health
and personal safety. This state-wide competition honors Wisconsin’s
leading manufacturers for their innovation. Consider applying today!
For more information, and to check out the application and the
rules for entrants, go to www.wspe.org/gnpa.html.
TOP |
| SPONSOR

UWM, with approximately
28,000 students, is one of only two Ph.D. granting research institutions
within the University of Wisconsin System. The College of Engineering
& Applied Science at UWM is a leading educational provider with
approximately 1,900 students, including over 300 at the graduate
level. These students are served by six departments: Civil Engineering
& Mechanics, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Industrial
and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Materials.
The degrees include a B.S. and M.S. in Engineering, a B.S and M.S.
in Computer Science, a new B.S. in Computer Engineering, a Ph.D.
in Engineering in the above disciplinary specialties, and a new
Ph.D. in Medical Informatics.
UWM
Discover. Innovate. Lead.
|
3. |
Take Advantage of the WSPE Job Board |
| Looking for a new job? Curious what kind of engineering
jobs are out there on the market today? Don't forget - WSPE has
a job board. Go to: http://www.wspe.org/jobboard.html
to check it out.
TOP |
4. |
The Judicial Review of Disciplinary Action
of the Examining Board of Architects, Landscape Architects, Professional
Engineers, Designers and Land Surveyors
By Attorney Robert J. Kay |
The practice of professional engineering is defined
by Section 443.01(6) of the Wisconsin
Statutes as follows:
(6) “Practice of professional engineering” includes
any professional service requiring the application of engineering
principles and data, in which the public welfare or the safeguarding
of life, health or property is concerned and involved, such as
consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning, design, or
responsible supervision of construction, alteration, or operation,
in connection with any public or private utilities, structures,
projects, bridges, plants and buildings, machines, equipment,
processes and works. A person offers to practice professional
engineering if the person by verbal claim, sign, advertisement,
letterhead, card or in any other way represents himself or herself
to be a professional engineer; or who through the use of some
other title implies that he or she is a professional engineer;
or who holds himself or herself out as able to practice professional
engineering.
“Professional engineer” is defined in Section 443.01(7)
of the Wisconsin Statutes as any person who by reason of his or
her knowledge of mathematics, the physical sciences and the principles
of engineering, acquired by professional education and practical
experience, is qualified to engage in engineering practice. However,
because of the important public interest in establishing that the
“professional engineer” is worthy of licensing, the
legislature has placed the licensing or registration requirements
for professional engineers with the Department of Regulation and
Licensing and specifically with the Examining Board of Architects,
Landscape Architects, Professional Engineers, Designers and Land
Surveyors, which is authorized to independently exercise its powers,
duties and functions prescribed by statute.
Among its duties, the Examining Board is expected to investigate,
hear and determine whether a professional engineer has been guilty
of (a) fraud or deceit in obtaining a registration, (b) using his
or her professional seal or stamp to be used on documents not prepared
by him or her or under his or her control, or knowingly permitting
his or her seal or stamp to be used by any other person, (c) knowingly
aiding or abetting the unauthorized practice of professional engineering,
(d) committing any act of gross negligence, incompetency or misconduct
in the practice of professional engineering, (e) violating any rules
of professional conduct promulgated by the Examining Board, or (f)
having been convicted of a felony or having been adjudicated medically
incompetent.
Disciplinary proceedings against a professional engineer are held
by the Examining Board subject to the Administrative Rules promulgated
for hearings and the Examining Board may reprimand, limit, suspend
or revoke the registration of a registered professional engineer
if it determines that substantial evidence exists that the engineer
violated one or more of the provisions of § 443.11(1) of the
Wisconsin Statutes. The action of the Examining Board is subject
to review by the circuit court for the county where the petitioner
resides and the petition for judicial review must be served on the
Examining Board and filed with the court within 30 days after the
service of an order finally disposing of the matter in dispute before
the Examining Board. The 30-day period allowed for the filing and
service of a petition for judicial review is jurisdictional. If
the petition is not timely served and filed, the circuit court has
no jurisdiction to review the decision of the Examining Board.
Readers can find an example of a judicial proceeding to review
the revocation of a license of a professional engineer in the Supreme
Court decision Vivian v. Examining Board of Architects, Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors, 61 Wis.2d 627, 213 N.W.2d 359 (1974).
In that case, the Examining Board itself filed a complaint against
Francis J. Vivian, a registered professional engineer, alleging
that his acts in designing and supervising the construction of a
garage addition that collapsed constituted gross negligence, incompetency
and misconduct. Following a hearing on the complaint, the Board
found that Vivian was employed to prepare plans and specifications
and to supervise construction of a garage addition, that he prepared
the plans and was responsible for supervising the construction,
that the garage addition collapsed due to a failure of an open web
frame truss which Vivian designed, but was not designed or constructed
to support a reasonable live load. The Examining Board entered conclusions
of law after its findings, holding:
(1) That the failure to design an “open web frame truss”
which would support a “reasonable live load” constituted
incompetency;
(2) That the failure to correct said design prior to construction
constituted gross negligence in the practice of professional engineering;...
The Board also determined that Vivian’s performance of welding
on the project without being a certified welder constituted misconduct.
Based on the findings and conclusions of the Examining Board, the
Board ordered his registration revoked for six months.
A petition for review was filed by Vivian with the circuit court
of Dane County who held: (1) Vivian was guilty of misconduct in
performing the welding, but (2) the acknowledged mistake of Vivian
in the design resulting in the roof collapse did not constitute
incompetence or gross negligence, and (3) there was no evidence
from which one could infer any such recklessness as would constitute
gross negligence or lack of ability to make a proper design as would
be said to be incompetence. The circuit court remanded the case
to the Examining Board for imposition of an appropriate remedy.
The Examining Board appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The
Supreme Court determined that its scope of review would be the same
as the circuit court’s scope of review, in that the issue
in the case was whether there was substantial evidence that supports
the Board’s findings, with due weight to be given to the experience,
technical competence and specialized knowledge of the Board. The
purpose of judicial review is not to retry the case and to substitute
the court’s judgment for that of the Board, but rather to
determine whether the Board’s finding of incompetency was
supported by substantial evidence. If not, the issue is to be remanded
to the Board for appropriate action.
In the Vivian case, the Supreme Court held that: (1) the determination
of grossness of negligence of the professional engineer is to be
made by those knowledgeable to the particular profession, (2) the
determination of whether a professional engineer’s failure
to properly design or supervise construction of a roof-supporting
truss on the garage addition was gross negligence was a matter for
the Examining Board and that the matter would be remanded to the
Board for such determination, (3) the Examining Board is holding
that the professional engineer’s failure to properly design
the garage addition which collapsed constituted incompetency was
not supported by substantial evidence, and (4) the statute making
incompetency, gross negligence or misconduct grounds for revocation
of a P.E. license requires “incompetence” to refer to
some demonstrated lack of competence or ability to perform professional
functions, and that “gross negligence” involves some
higher degree of failure to exercise ordinary care of judgment and
“misconduct” relates to some deviation from a fixed
duty or definite rule of conduct and that the three words are not
entirely synonymous nor completely interchangeable.
Not many cases involving complaints against professional engineers
reach the highest court of the State, but when they do, the cases
are instructive for all professionals. Recently, a case involving
a complaint against a veterinarian which was heard by the Veterinary
Examining Board was decided by the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and
is now the subject of a petition for review before the Wisconsin
Supreme Court. That particular case will be reviewed in the next
edition of this publication.
Attorney Robert J. Kay is the senior partner in the law firm
of Kay & Andersen, S.C. and devotes his time to representing professional
engineers, architects, contractors, material suppliers and owners
of construction projects. Please feel free to contact him at (608)
833-0077 or visit www.kayandandersen.com.
TOP |
5. |
Welcome New WSPE Members! |
The WSPE board of directors would like
to extend a heartfelt welcome to the following new WSPE members:
- Daniel J. Naze
Village Engineer
Village of Germantown
Metro Chapter
- Scott Michael Schramm, P.E.
President Strategic
Municipal Services Inc
Fox River Valley Chapter
New members contribute to the growth, strength and leadership of
the WSPE in enhancing its recognition as a leading voice for Professional
Engineers throughout Wisconsin and promoting excellence in engineering.
TOP |
|