| |
WSPE eNews
A monthly publication from the Wisconsin Society of Professional
Engineers
February 1, 2008 Edition
1. |
WSPE's President's Corner |
I was just reading through some past issues of WSPE
eNews and I noticed some common themes, mostly related to encouraging
members to take an active role in their professional society. I
especially encourage you to visit the eNews archives at http://www.wspe.org/enews.html
and read the President’s message from the March 2007 edition.
We are privileged to be part of one of the noblest professions
on earth. The things we engineers accomplish improve the quality
of life for people all across the globe. But being part of this
profession places certain obligations on us. For example, we need
to keep current on the state of the practice in our areas of expertise
and we need to encourage young people to become engineers and pass
on what we know so the profession can continue to grow. We also
need to take an active role in professional societies and politics
so we can help influence laws and public policies affecting the
engineering profession.
Fortunately, WSPE offers opportunities for our members to do all
of this and more. As Engineer's Week approaches (February 17-23,
2008), please consider making a presentation to some school children,
or attending an engineering meeting, or helping out with your regional
or state MATHCOUNTS competition, or nominating a fellow engineer
for an award, or joining a WSPE committee. Most importantly, please
consider becoming an officer at either the chapter or state level.
All of these activities benefit the engineering profession and the
people we serve, but becoming an officer also opens up a world of
opportunity for networking, learning new skills, traveling, and
influencing the direction of WSPE. It also paves the way for becoming
a leader at the national level.
Here is a quick update on legislative issues. Assembly Bill 181
authorizing the Department of Regulation and Licensing (DRL) to
create rules for mandatory continuing professional competency has
passed the Assembly and Senate and is awaiting signature by the
Governor. Once this becomes law, WSPE plans to work closely with
the DRL to help develop fair, relevant, and reasonable requirements.
Your input will be critical, so please start thinking about what
you would like to see.
Assembly Bill 69, which changes the allowable paths to engineering
licensure, has passed the Assembly and is now in the Senate. Assembly
Bill 553 requiring Quality Based Selection (QBS) for certain public
works projects is currently with the Committee on Urban and Local
Affairs. The Wisconsin State Bar Association petition to the Wisconsin
Supreme Court regarding establishing a definition of the “practice
of law” is currently in a comment period after a public hearing
in December. A proposed amendment to the definition would exempt
professionals already regulated by the DRL. Please contact Bob Givens,
P.E. at bob.givens@omnni.com
or 920-830-6171 for more information about any of these issues.
Our organization is only as strong as the people who belong to
it and who take an active role in governing it and delivering its
programs. We need everyone’s help to continue to be an advocate
for the engineering profession and to have a positive impact that
goes beyond just doing our jobs. Please contact Nancy Short at n.short@wspe.org
or 414-908-4950 x135 for information about WSPE programs, volunteer
opportunities, or officer positions. In closing, I would like to
thank everyone who has participated in WSPE activities so far this
year, including our Supporting Organizations, and welcome all the
new members who have joined WSPE. Thank you!
James Buggs, P.E.
TOP |
SPONSOR

College of Engineering
Department of Engineering Professional Development
Choose from more than 400 continuing education courses in engineering,
design, operations, production, maintenance, management and planning.
- Advance your career
- Network with your peers
- Solve on-the-job problems
- Earn nationally-recognized CEU, PDH and LU
Start planning your professional development today!
To enroll or receive more information visit us online http://epd.engr.wisc.edu
or call toll-free 1-800-462-0876 |
2. |
Engineer’s Week Feb. 17-23, 2008 |
| “Engineers make a world of difference”—this
is the theme for the 2008 celebration of engineers and their dedication
to making the world safer, healthier, more exciting and more efficient.
Go to www.eweek.org for more
information on this special week.
Just one of the highlights of this week includes the Future City
Competition. The mission of the National Engineer's Week Future
City Competition is to provide a fun and exciting educational engineering
program for seventh- and eighth-grade students that combines a stimulating
engineering challenge with a "hands-on" application to
present their vision of a city of the future.
Free engineer/volunteer kits are available to give you ideas to
celebrate this special week. If you've participated in Engineer's
Week before, it's likely you received a printed volunteer package.
The printed kit consists of a folded 2008 poster, including 3 classroom
activities printed on the reverse side, a one-page program FAQ sheet/DiscoverE
summary, an evaluation form for students and teachers, and printed
Product Catalog. There is no charge for this kit; limit one per
order. Order online, by mail or telephone: 412-741-1393.
TOP |
3. |
Governor’s New Product Award 2008:
Entries Due Feb. 11 |
| Applications Due: Feb. 11, 2008
Evening Awards Ceremony and Banquet: Apr. 17. 2008, Kalahari Resort,
Wisconsin Dells
Questions? Contact: Dale Swenson, 414-343-8452, dale.swenson@harley-davidson.com
Each year, the Governor’s New Product Award is given to participants
in a variety of categories for engineering quality products that
do a number of things, including save time, energy, effectively
utilize engineering principles, or increase environmental health
and personal safety. This state-wide competition honors Wisconsin’s
leading manufacturers for their innovation. Consider applying today!
For more information, and to check out the application and the
rules for entrants, go to www.wspe.org/gnpa.html.
TOP |
4. |
Symbiont Seminar on Phosphorus Removal
from Wastewater Feb. 28 |
Feb. 28
West Allis, WI
9:15am-5:00pm
Stringent USEPA water quality nutrient criteria (values as low
as 0.01 mg/L for phosphorus) have sparked major interest in nutrient
removal to very low levels. Phosphorus removal from municipal and
industrial wastewater is a hot topic for wastewater treatment operators
and regulators. This seminar will provide the technical principles
of phosphorus removal followed by real case studies. This seminar
is open to anyone involved with wastewater treatment. A team of
expert professionals has been assembled as presenters. 6 credits
will be provided for WI Wastewater Operators for full-day attendance.
Please RSVP by Feb. 11.
A block of rooms is set up at the Ambassador Hotel 414-345-5000.
Go to www.symbiontonline.com/wwseminar
for more details.
TOP |
| SPONSOR

UWM, with approximately
28,000 students, is one of only two Ph.D. granting research institutions
within the University of Wisconsin System. The College of Engineering
& Applied Science at UWM is a leading educational provider with
approximately 1,900 students, including over 300 at the graduate
level. These students are served by six departments: Civil Engineering
& Mechanics, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Industrial
and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Materials.
The degrees include a B.S. and M.S. in Engineering, a B.S and M.S.
in Computer Science, a new B.S. in Computer Engineering, a Ph.D.
in Engineering in the above disciplinary specialties, and a new
Ph.D. in Medical Informatics.
UWM
Discover. Innovate. Lead.
|
5. |
Competitive Bidding in Public Projects
and the Qualified Bidder
By Attorney Robert J. Kay |
Competitive bidding is usually required
as a matter of law for the construction of public buildings. The
process of competitive bidding contemplates the availability of
completed plans and specifications upon which each bid is based.
Consequently, nonconforming bids are usually rejected because strict
adherence to the plans and specifications is contemplated in order
to have a common standard upon which all bids can be judged. There
is no doubt that competitive bidding will not function successfully
unless bidders have a sense of confidence in the system. The preparation
and submittal of bids is a complex, expensive undertaking and bidders
wish to be reasonably assured that they will be treated fairly,
consistent with the rules of the game announced in the invitation
for bids.
From time to time, inexperienced bidders desire to bid on a competitive
bid project. Professional designers know that not all bidders are
qualified to perform the work which is the subject of their plans
and specifications. Accordingly, prequalification of bidders is
an essential step in assuring both public and private owners who
are engaged in procuring competitive bids that the bids represent
a meaningful offer to perform the work specified for the price bid.
Public construction projects are subject to the provisions of §§16.85
and 16.855 of the Wisconsin Statutes. Section 16.855(9) states:
(9) The department may require bidders to submit sworn statements
as to financial ability, equipment and experience in construction
and require such other information as may be necessary to determine
their competency.
The Wisconsin Department of Administration administers §§16.85
and 16.855 of the Wisconsin Statutes relating to engineering and
construction of public buildings. It has promulgated administrative
rules which are known as Chapter Adm 21 that relates to the advertising,
bidding and award of construction contracts. In Adm 21.02 various
definitions are set forth in these administrative rules, including
(7) which defines, “Lowest qualified responsible bidder.”
Those provisions are specific and numerous. Consequently, I believe
that they should be reviewed from time to time so that design professionals
and contractors are fully informed about who is regarded as a qualified
or responsible bidder under the Wisconsin Statutes governing construction
by competitive bidding. I set forth the entirety of Adm 21.02(7)
in this article:
(7) "Lowest qualified responsible bidder" shall be defined
to include all of the following which must be met to be considered
for award of contract:
- Lowest bidder. The lowest bidder is one whose bid contains the
lowest total dollar amount when compared with other bids submitted
for the same work. Should the specifications require evaluation
of other factors in conjunction with lowest dollar amount to determine
the lowest bidder, a formula shall be specified which will permit
the conversion of evaluation factors to a dollar value.
- Qualified bidder. A qualified bidder is one who meets the following
conditions:
- Has completed one or more projects of at least 50% of the
size or value of the division of work being bid and the type
of work completed is similar to that being bid. If a greater
magnitude of experience is deemed necessary, other than size
or value of the work, such requirements will be described
in the specifications.
- Has access to all necessary equipment and has organizational
capacity and technical competence necessary to enable performance
of the work properly and expeditiously.
- Consideration will be given to associations consisting of
2 or more contracting firms organized for the purpose of entering
into a construction contract as a single entity, providing
the assignment of and provisions for continuity of the various
responsibilities within the association are agreed upon prior
to award of contract and further providing that either of
the individual firms constituting the association is qualified
as defined herein.
- In the event that the project is of such magnitude as to
limit competition as a result of the conditions established
for qualification, the department may waive the condition
for bidder qualification.
- The department may require bidders to submit sworn statements
as to financial ability, equipment and experience in construction
and require other such information as may be necessary to
determine their competency. Bidders failing to submit required
sworn statements shall be deemed not qualified.
- Responsible bidder. A responsible bidder is one who meets the
following conditions:
- Maintains a permanent place of business.
- Provides a sworn statement upon request, which evidences
the bidder has adequate financial resources to complete the
work being bid, as well as all other work the bidder is presently
under contract to complete.
- Is bondable for the terms of the proposed contract.
- Has a record of satisfactorily completing past projects.
Criteria which will be considered in determining satisfactory
completion of projects by contractors and subcontractors will
include:
- Completed contracts in accordance with drawings and
specifications.
- Diligently pursued execution of the work and completed
contracts according to the established time schedule unless
extensions are granted by the owner.
- Fulfilled guarantee requirements of the contract documents.
- Established and diligently maintained a satisfactory
affirmative action program in accordance with the contract
provisions.
- Established and diligently maintained a satisfactory
safety program in accordance with the contract provision.
- Is not presently on an ineligible list maintained by the
department of administration for noncompliance with equal
employment opportunities and affirmative action requirements
as provided for in s. 16.765(9), Stats., or on any other agency
list for construction related violation of statutes or administrative
rules.
Although competitive bidding in non-public projects is not required
by law, similar provisions regarding the definition of “lowest
bidder”, “qualified bidder” and “responsible
bidder” are often found in bid invitations for non-public
projects.
Attorney Robert J. Kay is the senior partner in the law firm
of Kay & Andersen, S.C. and devotes his time to representing professional
engineers, architects, contractors, material suppliers and owners
of construction projects. Please feel free to contact him at (608)
833-0077 or visit www.kayandandersen.com.
TOP |
6. |
Engaging the Customer
By Marc Annacchino, P.E |
In any business endeavor, the “Market”
we always refer to is a collection of customers. Sometimes this
“collection” is large, homogeneous in their preferences,
and predictable. Sometimes they are small groups, splintered and
with differing needs and wants. In order to sift out market opportunities
for new products, we must “Engage” these customers.
Let’s look at some of the ways we can do this……………
Interviewing
Although it is only one of the primary means for market investigation,
interviewing is such a valuable technique. If approached properly
and under the right conditions, the customer is the most accurate
means for assessing your company’s products and their standing
in the marketplace. If you listen and attempt to internalize what
the customers are telling you in an interview, they will communicate
most if not all of the qualitative data you will need.
When conducting an interview, it’s best to review the customer’s
company operations, first. This will give you a feel for the operation
and how this customer makes money. It will also give you a perspective
on how your company and its products will fit into the overall plans,
as well as determine the legitimacy of the respondents’ comments
by materiality. The interview will allow you to discover latent
needs that the customer may not readily know they have. This generates
the opportunities for new product ideas.
It’s best to have samples, models, examples, and props to
enhance the exchange and draw out response. Do not be averse to
broaching issues that may be controversial (pertaining to the subject
matter at hand), because this will give perspective on the attention
level of the respondent and his or her biases, and will yield perspective
on other comments.
Now that you are talking, let’s actually communicate………..
Directly Engaging the Customer
As part of the visit you will want to engage the customer in a
frank discussion about their business, its driving forces, its vulnerability,
and how they navigate the competitive threats to find success. This
discussion should be a free and open exchange. To have a real appreciation
for the customer and their needs, it becomes necessary to understand
their business.
The process of customer engagement consists of 3 basic themes as
outlined below:
First: Listen To The Customer. You have created the venue for an
exchange, so take the time and energy to really listen,
not sell.
- The customer has an issue or problem to resolve. Recognize
it!
- This is why you are here to pick up on subtleties and act accordingly.
- The customer is not predisposed to your solution; so do not
try to convince them at this time.
- The best evaluation of competitive standing is to remove yourself
from the sales arena and place yourself at the customer’s
perspective and evaluate all alternatives.
Secondly: Move the interchange to a Process Of Discovery
- Conduct a Dialog, not a sales presentation!
- The interchange should be a mutual process of discovery.
- The probes for conditions, customer alternatives, acceptance
scenarios and prerequisites.
- Understand and framing the customer’s business, alternatives,
decision breakpoints and their product pathways.
- Determine and reduce the information to flowchart and breakpoints.
Finally: Look For The Hidden Opportunity for your company
- How can your company create a product or service that enhances
the customer’s ability to pursue their market more effectively?
- Discovery should produce the customers and hidden opportunities,
competitive situation, and threats to securing the business.
To get started, consider the following as a framework for an initial
discussion:
You may want to use the following points to engage the customer.
These discussion interrogatories are open-ended and require thought
to create mutual understanding.
What are the areas in your organization that currently fall
short of skill set and performance index required to achieve your
business vision? Who, what, where, how, and why? This allows for
an open-ended forum between you and the respondent. It allows
you to draw out complaints initially, and then to get specific
ideas on the table for discussion. Share your company’s
experiences also.
From a historical perspective, what are you doing about them?
This determines the commitment level of the management and the
organization to change, and to the strategic vision.
What is your business vision? This is a good test to determine
if the organization has established a vision and if it has filtered
down through the organization.
What operational or product changes are you making to achieve
this result? Again, this determines the effectiveness of the management
structure to effect change toward a specific goal.
What do you need to make operations easier, more efficient, to
increase output, and to exercise better control? This open-ended
discussion allows the respondent to identify any latent needs
in the organization.
If you were asked to double output with the same resources, what
would you expect to be required to achieve this? This removes
the specter of the status quo and forces the respondent to push
performance of the organization. It helps the respondent to identify
future needs.
What is currently considered impossible or impractical, but if
you had access to it, you could increase effectiveness? This question
allows the respondent to dream of a future workplace and identify
latent needs to achieve it.
What do you look for in a supplier? This identifies the customer’s
expectations.
How can we become a preferred supplier to your company? This
determines if you have a chance at the business and the account.
What are your critical competitive pressures? This allows you
to determine a way to partner with them.
The key to identifying the potential new product is to synergistically
combine all of the ideas and requirements into the tangible improvement
of the next-generation product.
Surveys and Customer Feedback
Surveys and customer feedback should not be conducted only at the
onset of a program. These need to be an integral part of the process
of refinement, product evolution, and subsequent product developments.
Never get too far away from the customer because this will lull
an organization into complacency, or worse, remove the feedback
loop in the process.
Extracting the Opportunity within the Complaint
The customer grants a significant favor to you by their complaint.
Your company may have sold them something that fell short of their
expectations, and they thought enough of it to complain. We as market
and product development professionals may not like or want to listen
to the complaint; however, there is a lot to be mined out of one.
In effect the customer is telling you what you did wrong.
If one evaluated the leverage of the situation, a single complaint
is worth quite a bit to the organization if you are going to do
something about it. If you view it as a nuisance, then it has no
value; however, if you plan on changing to meet the customer’s
expectations, then it has great value. In other words, how many
other customers who didn’t complain would have to stop buying
from you for you to lose enough market share to notice? How many
customers would you have to survey to find out what this one complaining
customer is telling you directly? Clearly it is a valuable means
of feedback.
Exchange of Knowledge and Experiences
During your discussion, it is critical to establish an open and
free exchange of ideas, problems, and opportunities between the
two companies. Establish a spirit of cooperation at the management
level and drive it through the organization. Create the atmosphere
of going after a market opportunity together, with each contributing
a portion of the talent and effort to get there. Constantly look
for how the two companies can both profit from the market segment,
since very few companies are absolute leaders in a market with a
position strong enough to dominate and affect control of the segment
by themselves.
Establishing the Rapport, Expertise, Assistance, Improvement,
and Authority
This exchange should establish a lifelong rapport between the personnel
of the businesses that will transcend any minor market fluctuation,
upset, or competitive thrust. Your actions need to position you
as an indispensable partner integral to your customer’s plans.
Make sure to plug the customer (now your partner) into your organization.
Balance the sacrifice you will make in availing the customer of
your resources with the positioning of indispensability within their
organization.
Correlating the Data
Examine the responses carefully and group the data into some meaningful
way to draw product conclusions from it. Look for product configuration
patterns in the summary of data so that product planning can serve
the market with the proper product.
Does the data received make sense with other information gathered?
Has the data been corroborated in some way to substantiate the results
and accurately draw conclusions? Did you notice any conflicting
data that would require more research? Summarize it in some kind
of a spreadsheet to allow viewing and sorting of the data. Organize
it for eventual presentation to management. The results should tell
the story of the opportunity to management.
Testing the Data
Finally, test the results and the data supporting the conclusions
by visualizing the product available for sale today. Evaluate how
it will sell in the marketplace today. Would it sell? Why or why
not? Visualize the product selling in the future, project the future
market needs, and (after development time has elapsed) determine
if it will still sell or if you would have lost the window of opportunity.
Do the results of this reinforce that you are targeting the right
generation of product?
Portions excerpted from Marc A. Annacchino’s book The
Pursuit of New Product Development
ISBN-10: 0-7506-7993-X
Marc Annacchino, P.E., is owner of Marconi Product Development
Institute, Inc., a company providing consulting services, contract
development, seminars, and other services. He can be reached at
Marconi@execpc.com.
TOP |
7. |
Welcome New WSPE Members |
The WSPE board of directors would like to extend
a heartfelt welcome to the following new WSPE members:
- Scott R. Grasse, P.E.
Engineering Manager
CMD Corp.
Fox River Valley Chapter
- Brust J. Robert, P.E.,
VP
Harwood Engineering
Metro Chapter
- David M. Ahern
Construction Project Manager
RMT Inc.
Metro Chapter
- Maria A. Schlicht
QA Electrical
Astronautics
Metro Chapter
- Jon P. Blomquist, P.E.
KL Engineering Inc.
Wisconsin Valley Chapter
New members contribute to the growth, strength and leadership of
the WSPE in enhancing its recognition as a leading voice for Professional
Engineers throughout Wisconsin and promoting excellence in engineering.
TOP |
|